February 2009
For an example of the vagaries and effect of opinion in mathematics
let's look at the seemingly mundane topic of 00 (0^0 or 0
raised to the 0th power).
Review any history on this topic and you will see how much of popular
mathematics is "indeterminate", "controversy" and
"consensus". Personally I prefer my mathematics to be based on,
well... mathematics.
Many fail to distinguish between the ordinal and quantity uses of zero
in this expression. This is another case where a dodgy view of zero can be
misleading.
For A0 any non-zero number "A" raised to the power
of zero is generally agreed to equal 1. This result of 1 is the same as
the number of dimensions in the number A.
Popularly, using the { 0 } view of zero, 00 is supposed to
equal 1 (or it's undefined depending on your opinion).
Taking the null view, when A=0 null cannot be raised to any power, so
the result is null or zero. Zero is also the number of dimensions in our
view of zero.
When we view the quantity as { 0 } we assume there is a number to work
with, when using the { } view we assume there is no number. As an
ordinator we use it as the set of a single integer halfway between -1 and
1, i.e. { 0 }. It may also be an empty quantity { } we wish to raise
to this 0th power. Each of these uses of zero has different rules. 0^0 is
also discussed in Ordinals
and Quantities.
Controversies such as this show that our understanding of mathematics
is not as complete as we would like, however it is the purpose of these
pages to focus on the mathematics of physics. Can anyone think of a valid
use of 00 in physics? Let me know.
One of our objectives in these pages is to uncover other controversial
areas where mathematics and physics collide. If there's another raging
topic on zero or infinity you'd like to discuss please contact
us.
Regards,
AJ Corcoran
|